.
Feedback

Pacifica Beaches Resembled 'War Zone' on Night of Fourth, Cleanup Volunteer Says

Montara woman collected 35 gallons of toxic fireworks remnants on the night of the Fourth. She's urging Pacifica residents to demand the city ban the sale of legal fireworks.

On a night when America celebrated its independence, the picturesque Pacifica beaches that are a destination for thousands of Bay Area residents each year more closely closely resembled a Third World toxic dump, according to a Montara woman who along with a friend, spent the night of the Fourth combing the beaches for fireworks debris.

Sue Pemberton and fellow coastal resident Myrna Faulds removed enough fireworks remnants to fill buckets totaling 35 gallons that she believes would have been swept to sea by an incoming tide.

Environmentalists say fireworks debris contain toxic pollutants that can kill marine wildlife if ingested.

Pemberton called the experience an "eye-opener," and is urging fellow coastal resident to demand Pacifica ban the sale of legal fireworks.

Pacifica is among a handful of Bay Area cities and two in San Mateo County allowing the sale of so-called "safe and sane" fireworks. San Bruno is the other.

Pemberton said getting as many of the fireworks remnants off the beaches as possible before a six-foot tied rolled in was critical to protecting the coastal waters.

Local groups that profit from the sale of legal fireworks are required to clean up the beaches of Pacifica the day after Fourth of July celebrations, but Pemberton said the such measures are woefully inadequate considering the massive amounts of toxic debris that littered beaches on the night of the Fourth she observed.

"The beach looks like a war zone," Pemberton said in an email to the Pacifica Beach Coalition, a local environmental group that so far has taken a neutral stance on the city's policy allowing the sale of so-called "safe and sane" fireworks. 

Pemberton said she and Faulds saw some setting off fireworks properly discarding the remnants in buckets, but said they were in the minority. 

The on the night of the Fourth and on Saturday.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook |Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Hnin May 24, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Please help share it on your facebook as well. Anything to find our cat.Read More http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/laf/3825190526.html
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.