.
Feedback

School Parcel Tax Vote in June: Are You In?

The Jefferson Union High School District is asking voters to approve a $48 parcel tax to soften the state's cuts to education. Will you vote yes?

In June, for the third time in less than two years, the Jefferson Union High School District will run a parcel tax past voters. 

Residents within the district, which covers Pacifica, Daly City, Colma, Broadmoor and Brisbane will see Measure Y on June 5's ballot. It's a $48-per-parcel annual tax lasting four years with an exemption for seniors 65 years old and over. 

Proponents of the tax, which have branded their campaign as "Yes on Measure Y - Protect Our High Schools", say the tax is necessary to preserve core programs at local high schools, including and , in the face of continuing cuts by the state to education funding. 

"Since 2008, state funding for our high schools has been cut by $3.4 million annually," the campaign's website says. "Now, our schools may face another $1.5 million in cuts next year."

Yes on Y is emphasizing student preparedness for college in its campaign literature. 

"To continue preparing our students for college and high paying jobs, our high schools—Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Westmoor and Thornton—need a stable source of funding," the website reads. 

Another key component of the funds that could potentially be raised by Measure Y is that they would stay local and the state cannot take them away if it decides to go ahead with further cutting education funding. 

The $48 amount is just half of what the district has asked voters to approve twice before, once in and . 

The amount was lowered after extensive polling by the district's research and consulting firms, Godbe Research and TBWB Strategies. Supposedly, there is adequete support for the new, lower amount. 

Adequete support means a two-thirds majority vote in support of the tax, a threshold JUHSD has been unable to reach the last two times it's tried. 

So, will you support Measure Y in June? Take our poll and let us know in the comments. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8