.
Feedback

County Office of Ed Says it's 'Not Flush With Cash'

The San Mateo County Office of Education says $7 million in reserve funds are untouchable when it comes to special education teacher's salaries or benefits.

As union representatives from the San Mateo County Educator Association (SMCEA) and county officials prepare for another round of contract negotiations for special education specialists later this month, the San Mateo Office of Education wants to dispel the notion that it’s able tap into $7 million in county reserve funds to help raise salaries or bolster benefit packages.

The $7 million question has been a particular bone of contention among Association members who cite stagnated and inadequate salaries as central to their mounting frustrations with the county. The roughly 140 teachers, nurses and counselors that make up the SMCEA have been working without a contract since August.

Nancy Magee is a community relations official for the county’s office of education. She said that while it may appear that the county and the Office of Education are flush with cash, in fact, a number of state regulations currently prohibit the money from being dispersed.  

“The union is frustrated that they see the money in those reserve accounts and feel like they should be able to benefit from that. While we are bargaining in good faith and we do expect that we will reach an agreement, the union is asking for a 9% raise, and I think a lot of that is based on their interpretation of the reserve account.”

Magee said that the money came from property tax collections, which the typically go to fund the county office, and the educational programs that the county supports. But, Magee said, there are strict limitations placed on how much of that money the county is able to allocate for operational expenses.

“Whatever our revenue limit is from the state, we have to hold to that level. Just because we have excess dollars from property tax, doesn’t mean that we’re allowed to spend them,” she said. In other words, while the money can be collected in the form of property tax revenues, the county is bound by the spending limits placed on it by the state’s education code.

San Mateo County is also set to lose $4.5 million in reserve revenue next year as the state works to phase out Regional Occupational Programs (ROP), which provide career preparation classes to work-bound youth and adults. “Because the state is eliminating ROP, we will not be allowed to access that $4.5 million for next year,” Magee said.

Whether or not the county’s response will at all placate the SMCEA remains unclear, but Magee said that above all, county officials “fully expect to settle with a fair, reasonable and responsible resolution… The county office of education is definitely bargaining in good faith with an expectation that we can come to a reasonable agreement with the union.”

The next round of negotiations has been scheduled for March 20.

Keep up with local news — follow Patch!

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Hnin May 24, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Please help share it on your facebook as well. Anything to find our cat.Read More http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/laf/3825190526.html
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.