.
Feedback

Pacificans Quash Fire Suppression Assessment Tax, City Eyes Layoffs

A high-ranking city employee may be on the way out.

Pacifica residents voted down a l today with 63 percent against it and 37 percent for it, said City Clerk Kathy O’Connell at 6p.m.

Pacifica Mayor Mary Ann Nihart said that in the face of this vote the city is going to consider laying off employees.

She indicated that the city would take a look at some of the layoffs it was considering last budget year. Documents from last year's budget study sessions show that one of those options may be relinquishing Pacifica City Attorney Cecelia Quick of her duties.

"I have no idea," said City Manager Stephen Rhodes when asked about the layoffs. "But there is probably not much else to do. It depends on how much people think needs to be cut."

If Quick is to lose her job, Pacifica would contract out its legal services at an hourly rate for a projected savings. The city would incur another cost in letting its attorney go, however: her severance package, which pans out to about $120,000. 

More details about what or whom the city will cut in the near future will come at tomorrow night's city council budget study session and at Thursday's Financing City Services Task Force meeting. 

"Everything is on the table" Nihart said. 

Councilman Len Stone saw the writing on the wall when it comes to tax measures in Pacifica, however. 

"I think it's a statement that [Pacificans] don't want any more to come out of their pockets," he said. "We can hopefully start to get active now in developing our local economy and not just rely on assessments and taxes."

Rhodes agreed.

"I guess it's disappointing, but I understand," he said. "People can't afford it or didn't find it [the tax] justified right now. We have our marching orders."

Stay tuned to Pacifica Patch for updates.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8