.
Feedback

Supreme Court Weighs Pacifica Attorney's Pending Disbarment

Linda Lowney was recommended for disbarment by the State Bar of California for secretly marrying elderly client, misappropriating funds from his estate.

A Pacifica attorney could lose her license to practice law after  and misappropriated his savings after his death, according to the State Bar of California.

Attorney Linda Lowney obtained a confidential marriage license to marry her client, Thor Tollefsen, who was suffering from emphysema and terminal cancer, in 2006, by filing a falsified document, according to an opinion issued Thursday by state Bar Court Judge Catherine C. Purcell, writing for a three-judge review panel.

Lowney then misappropriated funds for which Tollefsen had clearly designated his nieces as beneficiaries, according to the opinion.

Lowney was recommended for disbarment by a state Bar Court hearing judge in March 2011. She filed an appeal, arguing that a one-year suspension would be more appropriate given that she had practiced for 32 years without discipline.

But in her opinion Purcell said the disbarment, which is now pending a decision by the California Supreme Court, is warranted given the serious nature of Lowney's misconduct.

"This case demonstrates the tragic results that happen when an attorney's greed prevails over fiduciary responsibilities to a client," Purcell wrote. "Lowney's overreaching misconduct toward Tollefsen is simply inexcusable, despite her 32 years of discipline-free practice."

Lowney became Tollefsen's attorney in 2002 and helped him prepare a will and trust naming his sister and nieces, who lived in Norway, as heirs to his estate, which was worth between $1 million and $1.5 million, including real estate.

She became romantically involved with Tollefsen around August 2005, when Tollefsen was 85 and she was 54. She promised to take care of him and persuaded him to sign over more than $300,000 in funds held at Franklin Templeton to her for use in his care.

They were married in January 2006 by a confidential marriage license, and at Lowney's direction they falsely stated that they had been living together, according to Purcell's opinion. By fall of 2006, however, Tollefsen was complaining to his family that he could not reach Lowney and that she was not taking care of him. He moved into a senior care facility in January 2007.

Later that same month, Lowney brought Tollefsen to his home for a weekend. When he appeared ill the following day she called an ambulance and followed him to the hospital, but did not stay.

Tollefsen died the next day, alone at the hospital.

When his family learned of his death through a neighbor, his nieces traveled to the United States to take care of his estate, and learned that Lowney had cremated their uncle against his express wishes and taken financial documents from his house, Purcell wrote.

A four-year legal battle followed, in which Lowney moved Tollefsen's funds into her own accounts and sought to have his nieces removed as co-trustees to his estate, Purcell noted. Tollefsen's family successfully sought to have the marriage declared void, but spent more than $600,000 in legal fees during the fight, and received only $500,000 in a settlement, Purcell noted.

--Bay City News

For more news and information about Pacifica and surrounding areas, follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Got Patch? Sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8