.
Feedback

Soaring Pacifica Trash Rates Already Almost Double What Montara Residents Pay

Pacifica’s city council will consider an additional 1.9 percent rate hike to customers who already pay some of the highest rates in the county.

If you live in Pacifica, it costs $35.95 to have your 32-gallon garbage containers collected.

Just seven or so miles to the south, it costs Montara residents $18.02 to have that same trash bin emptied.

Pacifica residents, who could soon see an additional collection fee rate increase, already pay some of the highest rates on the Peninsula, according to data provided to Patch by Recology, a private waste management company that serves most of San Mateo County.

Recology spokeswoman Gina Antonini said rates for the coastal Peninsula cities were negotiated by Coastal Scavenger, the distressed competitor her company bought out in 2010.

“These were rates that were not set by Recology and were inherited when they bought the service territory and acquired that company because they were having financial issues,” Antonini said.

Recology is in negations with Montara and Pacifica to adjust those rates, Antonini said.

“We'll work to figure out an appropriate rate over the next few months of negotiations,” Antonini said.

Atherton tops the Peninsula trash collection rate pile, with residents paying $55.00 to have a 32-gallon container collected. East Palo Alto ($39.81) is the only other city Recology serves where customers pay more.

San Mateo residents get the most bang for their garbage buck, paying just $17.76 to have their 32-gallon containers emptied.

Recology public affairs manager Gino Gasperini said that his company negotiates contracts with municipalities and county officials for residents in unincorporated areas, who then set residential rates.

“The rates do vary,” Gasperini said. “A lot of the mountainous areas take longer to service than the flat areas here (in San Mateo), so that’s a (cost) driver as well.”

Pacifica’s city council will consider a 1.89 percent rate increase on at a Nov. 26 meeting, according to Pacifica Riptide, which is circulating a downloadable petition protesting the rate hike.

The rate hike would be Pacifica’s fourth since the 2010 Coastal Scavenger takeover, Riptide correspondent Lionel Emde reports.

 

Recology Trash Collection Rates in San Mateo County

 

20G

32G

64G

96G

Atherton

$27.00

$55.00

$110.00

$164.00

Belmont

$16.93

$28.03

$61.77

$99.86

Burlingame

$12.90

$23.85

$47.71

$70.80

Unincorporated

$25.80

$30.66

$54.34

$77.19

East Palo Alto *

$39.81

$39.81

$39.81

$39.81

Foster City

$11.82

$24.70

$37.84

$56.76

Hillsborough **

$17.40

$27.50

$57.40

$92.40

San Mateo

$11.10

$17.76

$39.15

$60.54

Menlo Park

$13.99

$23.40

$55.99

$83.72

N. Fair Oaks *

$24.70

$24.70

$24.70

$24.70

Redwood City

$11.05

$26.51

$53.02

$78.70

San Carlos

$18.03

$28.84

$60.00

$91.80

West Bay Sanitary Dist.

$21.00

$34.00

$67.00

$101.00

Pacifica

Not available

$35.95

$71.89

Not available

Montara

Not available

$18.02

$64.82

Not available

El Granada

Not available

$18.02

$64.82

Not available

 

 

 

Source: Recology

* East Palo Alto and North Fair Oaks residents are given the same size collection carts.

**Hillsborough residents pay an additional $25 monthly fee.

Note: Recology declined to provide rates for 20 and 96 gallon containers in Pacifica, Montara and El Granada.

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8