.
Feedback

Supes to Consider SMC Management of Sharp Park Golf Course

Tuesday's meeting will also feature proposed garbage rate hikes for a part of the unincorporated county and the development of a controversial home in Stanford Weekend Acres.

The future of the Sharp Park Golf Course

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors will consider what can be done to preserve the future of .

The plot of land that is owned and operated by the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department is one of only two public golf courses in San Mateo County.

It is also home to the threatened red legged-frog and endangered San Francisco garter snake. A suit filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, based in Tucson, Arizona, seeks to have the course shut down in order to preserve the habitat for those species.

Though a federal judge denied a temporary injunction requested by plaintiffs to curb golf until the suit is decided, the case will continue in July.

The county fears for the potential loss it may suffer should the course be closed.

"Closing the golf course would have a negative impact on the City of Pacifica both environmentally and economically," said the report. "The City would lose park land and the esthetic beauty of a public golf course right on the ocean."

In the meantime, the county believes that the plot of land could be redesigned in a fashion that would allow for the rare species to exist without intrusion, as well as keep the golf course in operation.

If approved by supervisors, the County Manager's office could enter into negotiations for a possible partnership between San Mateo County and the City and County of San Francisco regarding how Sharp Park is handled in the future.

Garbage rate hike

Residents in part of unincorporated San Mateo County may face a nearly $4 per month spike in their garbage collection bill over the course of the coming year under a proposal being addressed by the county Board of Supervisors tomorrow.

The county last year began a contract with Recology San Mateo to provide garbage, green waste and recycling collection services across the region from Menlo Park to Burlingame.

According to a county report, the proposed 14.7% rate hike is necessary to cover increased costs Recology has incurred due to changes in service, expense fluctuations in the market, worker compensation and equipment.

The approved rate hike would increase the monthly collection bill for the average 32-gallon can by $3.93.

In the past year, the company increased collection of recycling and green waste materials by 30% and decreased garbage disposal by 19%.

The South Bayside Waste Management Authority, which operates the landfill and recycling center that receives collections from Recology San Mateo, said the increased diversion of collected material will increase the life of the county's landfill.

If supervisors elect to vote against the proposed rate increase, SBWMA projects a $362,888 revenue shortfall, according to the report.

The public is invited to speak before supervisors take action on the issue. County staff has recommended an approval vote.

Stanford development

The Board will again hear a proposal by Ramin Shahidi to develop his property in the Stanford Weekend Acres community, an unincorporated region of the county.

Shahidi's previous proposal to build a large home on the same property prompted supervisors - amidst outrage from neighbors - to alter zoning regulations that would limit homes of that size from being built in the community.

His most recent proposal is to split his current plot of land into two parcels, on which he hopes to build two separate homes, each approximately 2,000 square feet, rather than one large home.

As part of the proposal, Shahidi has agreed to demolish an existing structure on his property which hangs near a cliff backing up onto San Francisquito Creek that county administrators believe poses a threat for erosion.

"Approval of this project will allow the County to require the demolition and relocation of the rear residence and will therefore minimize health and safety concerns and potential impacts to San Francisquito Creek," said the report.

The county has no authority to require the structure's demolition without approving the parcel subdivision, said the report.

The Board of Supervisors meets to address these issues, and more, Tuesday morning at 9 a.m. in the board chambers located at 400 County Center, Redwood City.

To view the full agenda for the meeting, click here

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8