.
Feedback

Residents Asked to Weigh In on Law Enforcement Outsourcing, Sales Tax Increase

A city task force is seeking input before service cuts and new taxes and fees are implemented in 2012.

The city is asking residents to say which service cuts and new tax measures they can stomach in 2012.

Options include outsourcing law enforcement with the sheriff’s office and raising the sales tax. 

It is estimated that at least $3.5 million in service reductions and/or revenue increase are needed over a five-year period ($700,000 annually), which started in 2008, to achieve financial stability in Pacifica.

In flyers mailed out in late 2011, the Financing City Services Task Force, which helps set budget policy in Pacifica, requested that residents fill out a survey, either on paper or electronically, indicating how much they like or dislike tax and cut options the task force is floating.

Residents can indicate on a five-point scale ranging from “support this option” to “oppose this option” how they feel about the task force’s ideas. They can also supply their own options in written form.

Public input is part of the ongoing process whereby the task force continues to try to fill a $3.5 million hole in Pacifica’s budget, meaning that through a mixture of revenue measures and service cuts, the city will need to save $700,000 each year during the five-year term.

The public will also have a chance to learn more about the various cuts and revenue measures at an open house called “Budget Cuts are Imminent & City Services will Change” on Jan. 11 at 6:30p.m. in the .

The cuts, taxes and fee proposals come in addition to about made in 2011 and after the defeat of another revenue measure—the failed . 

Some of the service cut options include reducing local library hours, reducing or eliminating senior services and the whopper: contracting with the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office for law enforcement in town and terminating the .

Some of the places where the task force believes it can make money, through fees and tax measures, include:

  • A restructuring and/or an increase in the annual cost of a Pacifica business license;
  • Applying the transient occupancy tax (TOT), or hotel tax, on vacation rentals in town; 
  • A one- or half-cent increase to the local sales tax;
  • A restructuring of the utility users tax to include not just gas and electricity but also telecommunications;
  • Levying a parcel tax similar to by the ;
  • Increasing the rent at city-owned properties, such as the Sanchez Art Center;
  • And collecting a $50-per-vehicle towing fee through the Pacifica Police Department;

In the survey, available online, the task force has outlined some pros and cons for each option and how much money each would generate or save.

For service cuts, outsourcing law enforcement far eclipses the other cut options in terms of dollars saved, but the impacts of no longer having a local police department could be great.

The task force estimates that it would save the city $1.5 million annually. If the city were to keep the police force and make all of the other cuts that the task force put in its survey, it would save under half that amount: $688,205.

The task force lists the cons of this move as a “loss of local control of services and identity with the community. Potential loss of jobs for current employees of the department. The City loses the ability to directly control the service level and the cost of the service. The knowledge that officers have about Pacifica may be lost. Significant costs (approximately $2 million) to reestablish local department if a decision was ever made in the future to return to a local department.”

In terms of revenue options, the big ones are the increase to sales tax by one cent, which would generate an additional $1.7 million, the utility users tax, which is estimated to bring in $800,000 a year and the parcel tax, which could bring in $1.2 million annually.

To fill out your survey, head to the city’s website. You can submit it electronically, via email or via snail mail. Submissions must be made before Jan. 20.

The various cut and revenue options will be explored at the Jan. 11 meeting, and the public will have a chance to weigh in there, too.

For more news about Pacifica and surrounding areas, including the San Mateo County Coastside, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8