.
Feedback

Poll: What Should Happen to Sharp Park Golf Course?

An ongoing lawsuit aims to end golfing, at least in part, at the historic course and one San Francisco Supervisor wants to turn it into a national park. What do you think?

Scroll down to take our poll on this issue.

An ongoing lawsuit against the City of San Francisco by environmentalist groups over alleged Endangered Species Act violations at when plaintiffs asked a judge to temporarily halt operational activities at the course.

The Wild Equity Institute, Center for Biological Diversity, National Parks Conservation Association, Surfrider Foundation, Sequoia Audubon and Sierra Club filed a motion for a temporary injunction against what the organizations call "illegal" golf cart use, water pumping and mowing at Sharp Park. Environmentalists claim the activities harm populations of red-legged frogs and San Francisco garter snakes, listed as threatened and endangered species respectively.

Such an injunction would realistically prohibit golf on a large part of the course, perhaps even nine of 18 holes.

The motion Friday is just one move made by environmental groups since a handful sued the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department, which manages the course, in early March, 2011.

Since then, environmentalists have against keeping the course open and called for it to be turned over to the Golden Gate National Recreation Area as a public park.

This proposal is supported by San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos, who the Board of Supervisors in early September, citing the need to protect the two species from further harm and casting doubt on the profitability of the golf course.

Golfers have and to save the golf course. They've sought to attack both the allegedly scientific and political reasons and a by the Wild Equity Institute in February.

The injunction called for by plaintiffs would last until the lawsuit is decided (there is no end in sight, currently) or until San Francisco adopts a plan to manage and protect the frogs and snakes at Sharp Park that meets environmentalists' , which would likely include the transformation of a large portion of the course to a reserve or park.

What do you think should happen to Sharp Park Golf Course? Should it remain as is, become part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area or should it be something in between? Take the poll below.

Read Pacifica Patch's past coverage of this issue on our topic page and follow updates by subscribing to the RSS feed. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter for updates, too.

Are you interested in blogging for Pacifica Patch about this issue or others? If you are, please apply. It's very easy. Tell thousands of your peers what you think about the future of Sharp Park Golf Course.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Hnin May 24, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Please help share it on your facebook as well. Anything to find our cat.Read More http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/laf/3825190526.html
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.