.

PG&E To Charge Ratepayers For More Than Half of $2.2 Billion Pipeline Project

The approval angered officials from San Bruno, where a pipeline explosion killed eight people in 2010.

The California Public Utilities Commission today approved a plan that will allow PG&E to charge ratepayers for more than half of a $2.2 billion project to upgrade its natural gas pipelines.

The approval of the plan, with a last-minute change removing a requirement that the utility take lower profits for five years, angered officials from San Bruno where a ruptured pipeline resulted in an explosion that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes in 2010.

PG&E's project includes pressure testing 783 miles of natural gas pipelines, replacing 186 miles of pipelines while upgrading another 199 miles and installing 228 automatic shutoff valves.

The plan approved by the CPUC at its meeting in San Francisco today requires PG&E ratepayers to foot the bill for roughly 55 percent of the projects while the utility's shareholders will fund the rest.

An initial ruling had initially put ratepayers on the hook for roughly 49 percent of the project and initially included a five-year term in which PG&E's rate of profit on its improvement investments would be reduced to 6.05 percent as part of a judge's recommendation.

But Wednesday evening, regulators amended the plan to disallow that recommendation and raise the rate to about 11 percent, giving what San Bruno Mayor Jim Ruane said equated to a $130 million "Christmas present" to PG&E.

"It's a slap in the face," Ruane said. "They blew up our town, they killed eight people, and here we are giving them cash."

State Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, said the change showed that "PG&E owns the state of California and the PUC."

Hill said, "It's shameful that they would allow PG&E to profit from their behavior, their negligence, their poor maintenance."

Thomas Long, legal director for the watchdog group The Utility Reform Network, said many of the pipelines in the project are only being replaced because PG&E lost the records for them.

"They had no idea if these pipelines were operating at safe pressures," Long said. "PG&E loses records, we should pay for it?"

PG&E spokeswoman Brittany Chord said the utility's shareholders have already spent $1.5 billion since 2010 on work to meet previously existing regulations and that "this proposed plan was put forward to address new safety expectations that were set by the CPUC."

Chord said, "We know we made a lot of mistakes, and we know we have a lot of work to do."

She said PG&E had sought to have ratepayers fund a higher percentage of the pipeline project — which is expected to add about $2 to the average monthly residential utility bill — but they were rebuffed by the CPUC.

In announcing the commission's decision, Commissioner Mike Florio said the project was "about moving forward and creating the safest natural gas infrastructure in the nation."

Florio said the ruling was a balance between the requests of PG&E and those of San Bruno officials and survivors of the blast.

"We have to make sure PG&E isn't rewarded for the past ... but we can't expect PG&E in the past to meet standards that didn't exist until now," he said.

What do you think? Should ratepayers be asked to help pay for the upgrades to the gas transmission lines?  Tell us in comments.

— Bay City News

Copyright © 2012 by Bay City News, Inc. — Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

Keep up with local news — follow Patch!

Sign up for Half Moon Bay Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like” us on Facebook
"Follow” us on Twitter


Sign up for Pacifica Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like” us on Facebook
"Follow” us on Twitter

 
Want to share your opinions with the Pacifica community? Start your
own blog here.

Martha Hector December 28, 2012 at 02:54 AM
ALL PG@E ratepayers are footing the bill for PG&E's "issues"? That's a travesty. PG&E makes enough money from us already. They should foot the bill for their upgrades. They didn't upgrade on a timely basis and people DIED in San Bruno because of that.
Susan H February 08, 2013 at 05:48 AM
YOU HAVE A CHOICE TO PAY LESS THAN PG&E! If you don’t like PG&E or want to pay less for your Natural Gas for your home or business, you can sign up with Ambit Energy. We entered California in September 2012 with deregulation so now you have a choice of who you buy your gas from. Nothing changes for you except a line on your bill and that you will save at least 8% or more per month. We offer a variable rate or a locked in contract rate. In addition, you get a 2 night hotel stay as a thank you gift, earn monthly travel points, and can earn free gas each month. Visit my customer website: http://www.hambit.joinambit.com or e-mail me at cshambit@cox.net or visit my personal website at www.energymlmca.com or my personal consultant website at www.hambit.whyambitworks.com Lots of choices, visit one or them all! Hope to hear from you, Susan

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something