.
Feedback

Opinion: Religion in Politics Assures Mutual Degradation

Christian organizations often stretch scripture to gain political currency, and this dislocates them from both the secular and spiritual realms.

 

Christian organizations and figures increasingly are throwing their weight around in politics, but to what end is not clear, except that it may not be positive for them. Their foray into D.C. is likely hurting them more than it helps them.

Oftentimes, these organizations stretch or even mutilate the Biblical scripture they supposedly stand on to make a point about political policy, and this brings to question whether they truly rely on the Bible at all. They become something other than an advocacy organization or scripture-based organization, with no real place in either realm. 

One such organization had a place at the California Republican Convention, however. The Traditional Values Coalition (TVC), an Anaheim, CA-based political activist organization that promotes “Bible-based traditional values” in American government held a prayer breakfast early Sunday morning in Burlingame. 

I asked Rev. Lou Sheldon, TVC co-director, what he thought religion’s role in politics was, as he’s in the unique position of manning the helm of a Christian political advocacy organization. 

“The role of religion is in making successful political legislation, things that will do some good, and the only way to get that to those essential ingredients of morality and religion that make it successful, is to return to the dispositions and traits [in a candidate] that lead to that. Something that most people have forgotten about is that this is one nation under God, and you don’t have to be a Christian to believe that, or a Jew or Muslim or Buddhist, you’ve got to believe in the source of an almighty power that we all most stand accountable before someday.”

It seemed as if Rev. Sheldon was taking a pretty wide-open stance with regard to what sort of candidate could champion legislation that would “do some good” and that he or she need only be a “God-fearing” person. 

“It’s important that we return to that principle that even John Adams endorsed, that our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people,” he went on. “There has to be sense of virtue, a strong spirit of virtue of what is right and what is wrong morally, I think that those kind of things make a big difference.”

But it became clear that Rev. Sheldon didn’t believe everyone was fit for governance.

He excludes Muslims from his list of suitable governors because of their religious law system, Sharia, in which Sheldon claims women are not treated equally to men.

“[The candidate] has to be one that advocates with virtue,” he said. “When you have a religion that advocates that women can’t vote, that women cannot drive a car, that women cannot run a business, that women cannot be elected to a political position, that’s not virtuous.” 

It also seems that his organization, like so many other Religious-Political advocacy groups, has slipped away from its scripture basis as it wades into politics.

Just take a look at TVC’s “About” section on its website.

There, the organization states that these values are:

  • Promoting religious liberty and a free society;
  • Uncovering wasteful spending in Washington;
  • Championing Judeo-Christian values in the public square;
  • Protecting traditional marriage and family as the cornerstone of society;
  • Securing the Constitution against the growing threat of Islam and Shariah law;
  • Defending human life from its earliest moments to natural death; and
  • Ensuring the economic security of future generations of Americans as a moral issue.

Several of these values are contradictory, such as “promoting religious liberty” while protecting the Constitution from Islam” and promoting a free society while allowing only “traditional marriage,” What’s more, some of these values, even if they may be worthy causes, have no foundation in scripture whatsoever, like “uncovering wasteful spending in Washington” and “Ensuring the economic security of future generations of Americans as a moral issue”.

One would think that if an organization were really trying to ward off Sharia-type law in America, it’d be wary of endorsing its own brand of religious law.

In his efforts to give Christianity greater clout in politics, Rev. Sheldon is, in a way, trying to make it easier to bring politics home to churches.

He’s lobbying for a bill, HR3600, which would amend an Internal Revenue Service code that prohibits “churches and other tax-exempt organizations participating in political campaigns or supporting or opposing candidates for public office”, according to the legislation’s summary.

“It means that in a Sunday school class, open debate about whether the president was right or wrong in his abortion law interpretation and about the pill and contraception could take place,” he said. “Or, let’s say they open an abortion clinic across from a Catholic church and three city councilmembers pushed for this and raised money for it, the church could say, ‘we should have a new city council and we’re announcing our support for these candidates’ that kind of thing. They would be granted the free exercise of their religion.”

So a figure like Rev. Sheldon and an organization like TVC not only discredit the role of religion in politics by smudging their own scriptural basis to gain political capital, they stand to make churches themselves not only places of worship and study, but potentially powerful political players.

Political candidates also suffer when they engage in overtly religious rhetoric rather than sticking to promises of policy change. 

When Gingrich blamed the Obama administration Saturday for a recent spike in gas prices and promised that, if elected, he would sign an executive order approving the Keystone XL pipeline project and wean America off of oil from the Middle East, he made a promise that voters can hold him to if he’s elected.

But when he told members of a Georgia church Sunday that "the forces of the secular left believe passionately and deeply, and with frankly a religious fervor, in their world view and they will regard what I am saying as a horrifying assault on what they think is the truth, because their version of the truth is to have a totally neutral government that has no meaning," he lost track of what it means to be an American politician, to be in a position to change people’s lives in a positive way through legislation based on virtue. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Hnin May 24, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Please help share it on your facebook as well. Anything to find our cat.Read More http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/laf/3825190526.html
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.