.
Feedback

OPINION: More Budget Cuts to City Services in 2012

Scaled wage reduction for city employees earning over $100,000 is the solution.

On New Year's Eve we received another lovely note from the city threatening to cut city services once again.

The card announced an upcoming meeting on Jan. 11 to discuss funding issues like reducing library hours, eliminating senior services, contracting with the county sheriff's department for law enforcement, and the ever popular solution of our senior staff: raising taxes.

Missing from this threat notice, of course, was the one solution our city staff will not consider, which is cuts to the compensation and wages we pay them, namely senior staff, department heads, fire and police. 

A very simple solution to our budget issues is a scaled wage reduction for the 80 plus city employees earning over $100,000 a year. If we reduce compensation of our senior staff, department heads, fire and police by a percentage point for every $10,000 earned, we will save over $1.5 million a year and that doesn't include similar reductions in benefits which would bring the total savings closer to $2 million a year. 

City staff are obviously trying to control the budget issue as evident by the big yellow threat notice and our elected officials seem powerless or uninterested in the solution that must take place for our city to remain solvent.

A scaled reduction in compensation of 1 percent for every $10,000 earned shares the pain of the evenly for all our employees. It must happen, there is no other way forward that is fair.

— Todd McCune Bray

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.