.
Feedback

Obama Visits Bring Unfunded Bills, Traffic Delays

The President’s recent Bay Area trips have brought national attention and notoriety to Redwood City and others, but even those residents who didn’t attend his fundraisers paid a fee—in traffic and security costs.

President Obama has been a frequent visitor to the Bay Area in recent months; however, the inspirational rallies have also served as fundraisers for his personal re-election campaign.

The President’s three previous Bay Area trips--the first and surrounding cities, the second in early June to San Francisco and the third in mid-July to San Francisco and Oakland--have featured eight official events, none of which were free of charge, some of which were ‘invite-only’, and all of which bore a hefty price tag.  

Obama’s May trip to the Peninsula and the South Bay began with a $38,500 per plate dinner at the Atherton home of Levi Strauss heir Doug Goldman and his wife, Lisa.

The dinner was followed by at Redwood City’s , with the cheapest seats selling for $250. Those wanting a closer look at President Obama for the theatre’s premium seats. The next morning, the President hosted a breakfast at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose, again with a $38,500 price tag.

Those unable to afford the events were nonetheless impacted. Many roads around downtown Redwood City and Atherton and drivers had to use alternate routes. In addition, Peninsula cities were required to foot the bill for substantial security expenses.

Redwood City spokesperson Malcolm Smith said that the cost to Redwood City for hosting President Obama was $116,000, due to the , firefighters and other emergency responders that needed to be available.

Atherton Mayor Bill Widmer said that the Town of Atherton has not established a final report of expenses incurred; however, he estimates the cost to Atherton as “considerable.”

Widmer has instructed the Atherton Police to send a bill to the Democratic Party for the expenses and is awaiting a response.

 

Has Romney Repaid Bills?

Similarly, Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, visited Redwood City’s on March 26 for a fundraiser. The began at $1,000 and ran up to $2,500 for a photo with the former Governor of Massachusetts.

Smith did not have access to the exact cost of Romney's March visit, but he stated that due to the less central location of the hotel and less security than required by a President, the expenses were substantially lower.

Though Redwood City did not ask either candidate’s campaigns for reimbursement, the Romney campaign has regularly repaid cities that request repayment when Mitt Romney makes campaign appearances.

After Newport Beach sent the Romney campaign an invoice for the $10,441 security cost, the amount was paid in full within 30 days.

President Obama’s campaign, in contrast, declined to pay an approximately $35,000 bill for his campaign events in the area.

 

Larger Cities Also Foot the Bill

For the breakfast fundraiser in San Jose, the final cost to the city was $97,965, according to San Jose Police Sergeant Jason Dwyer. San Jose had a budget deficit of $115.1 million in the 2011-12 fiscal year, and made cuts and layoffs that Mayor Chuck Reid described as “painful” in order to eliminate the deficit.

Though the President flew out of the private Moffett Field Airbase on the late May trip, his two subsequent trips involved Air Force One landing at San Francisco International Airport, creating further delays for Bay Area travelers in the summer season.

An early June visit to San Francisco involved two fundraisers, one exclusive ‘invite-only’ roundtable discussion, costing participants $35,800 and another more affordable luncheon at $5,000 per plate at the Merchants Exchange Building.  

The June visit, held on a weekday, created delays throughout the busy Financial District. Significant sections of California Street and Market Street, two major thoroughfares, were blocked off during the work day.

According to San Francisco Police Spokesperson Albie Esparza, the city is in the process of compiling the security costs from the June visit.

The President’s most recent visit to the Bay Area in mid-July involved his most affordable event yet, a in Oakland where the cheapest tickets went for $100.

However, in a city with a median per capita income of just over $30,000 per year, getting even a glimpse of President Obama would still be above the price range of most residents. For deep-pocketed donors, the President hosted another ‘invite-only’ roundtable discussion at $38,500 as well as a dinner at the Piedmont home of Real Estate mogul Wayne Jordan, also for $38,500.

The cost to the city of Oakland of the visit is still being compiled, Oakland spokesperson Karen Boyd told KQED. Boyd said the bulk of the costs are for rentals of barricades and paying police officers for overtime.

Oakland small business owners also reported significant drops in sales due to the President’s schedule blocking off traffic and forcing early closures, business owners told KQED.

Some business owners and managers in Redwood City at the mandatory closures of their businesses.

According to Mayor Widmer, due to a mutual aid package between Bay Area cities, every city will pay for some of the security expenses of a Presidential visit even if he is not coming to their city.

“When he goes to San Francisco or Woodside, we also support that. We have to provide at least an officer or two,” said Widmer, who added that Atherton would be sending a bill to the Democratic Party only for the direct costs of President Obama’s visit to Atherton.

Presidential visits are inevitably expensive, regardless of the purpose of the visit. However, these expensive visits for the purpose of fundraising without a free public event contrast with the idea that elected officials represent the middle class. For many working middle class, most of the fundraisers would cost half or all of their annual paycheck to attend.

Obama Campaign spokesperson Linda Serrato said the campaign had no comment on the cost of the visits, the disruptions or the lack of accessibility to the President. 

Neither candidate has yet scheduled a free Bay Area event.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook |Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8