.
Feedback

National Park Service Declines to Release Report on Taser Use, Drops Charges on Dog Walker

Congresswoman Jackie Speier presses the National Park Service to be more transparent about its Taser usage policy and to release investigative report on dog walker Taser incident last January.

Nearly six months later — after requesting information from the National Park Service (NPS) about its Taser usage policy and the results of an investigation concerning a Montara man who was stunned with a Taser by a ranger in the Rancho Corral de Tierra property for walking dogs off-leash — Congresswoman Jackie Speier has received a reply from the NPS, declining to release the details she's asking for.

The investigative report on the Taser incident that Speier is inquiring about is being held confidential under federal law, although it was intially to be released to the public after it was completed in April.

“The National Park Service has been dragging its feet since the investigation was completed on April 25th and has not been transparent and forthright with the public,” writes Speier in a press release issued yesterday. “First, I was told that the Privacy Act of 1974 prevents disclosure of the facts, then I was informed that a potential prosecution of the Tasing victim kept even the most basic details from being released.”

In the press release, Speier also makes known that the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) has dropped charges against the Montara dog walker Gary Hesterberg and has exonerated its ranger Sara Cavallaro.

Still, this “eliminates any legal barriers that are standing in the way of NPS releasing a summarized version of the facts that would be in compliance with the Privacy Act,” she writes. “I’m deeply disappointed in how the NPS has handled the matter from start to finish. NPS owes it to the public to be up front and honest about the results of the investigation and its Taser usage policy moving forward.”

The Jan. 29, 2012, Taser incident sparked such a tumult of public backlash, Speier called into question the ranger’s actions. Critics denounced the use of a Taser, while NPS officals said the Taser use was justified.

Today, she’s urging NPS director Jonathan Jarvis to revise the policy so that Tasers will only be used in very limited circumstances, in line with the majority of law enforcement agencies.

“I understand that the GGNRA is planning a community meeting for Monday, Sept. 10 in the area near Rancho Corral de Tierra. I plan on attending and expect that GGNRA leadership will be prepared to hear from the community about this issue and appropriately respond to their concerns at that time,” she writes.

Speier has also contacted Superintendent Frank Dean, urging him to inform the public of the results of the investigation and legal constraints that prevented complete disclosure. In the interest of transparency, Speier is asking Dean to convene a public meeting to answer questions about the incident itself and offer clarification about the Taser usage policy.

“It needs to reassure park visitors that force will only be used when absolutely required on the rarest occasions when a person is actively resisting a law enforcement officer," writes Speier. "As it stands, the current NPS policy is overly broad, flawed and allows rangers far too much discretion as to when they can use tasers.”

According to the Half Moon Bay Review, a meeting has been scheduled for 7 p.m., Sept. 6, at Farallone View Elementary School, 1100 LeConte Ave., Montara.

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook |Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Hnin May 24, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Please help share it on your facebook as well. Anything to find our cat.Read More http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/laf/3825190526.html
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.