.
Feedback

Hill to Urge Passage of Law Related to Driving After 'Booze Cruise'

The law, AB 45, stems from a fatal crash in San Mateo two years ago that occurred following hours of drinking on a party bus.

Charter buses could soon be required to ask whether alcohol will be served upon securing a reservation with customers if a bill authored by Assemblyman Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, is enacted into law.

Hill on Monday will hold a news conference along with Jody Eaton Iorns, executive director of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, and the parents of a teen killed in San Mateo two years ago in a crash following hours of drinking on a “booze cruise” bus to celebrate a friend’s birthday.

Hill will urge the Legistature to approve Assembly Bill 45, which would close a loophole in current law that holds limousine operators, but not charter buses, responsible for underage drinking.

Under the legislation, bus companies must notify the person making the reservation that they need to designate an adult chaperone. Bus drivers will be subject to a fine of $2,000, license suspension or revocation, or a misdemeanor if they do not comply. Chaperones also will be subject to a misdemeanor for providing alcohol to a minor.

Brett Studebaker, 19, died on Feb. 6, 2010, when he crashed his car into a sound wall on Highway 101 near San Mateo after spending hours drinking with friends on a charter bus.

Authorities later determined he had a blood-alcohol level of 0.26, more than three times the limit for drivers who can legally drink.

The news conference will be held at 10 a.m. Monday in the 1200 block of Polk Street in San Francisco.

A two-block stretch in San Francisco of Polk Street -- where party buses often unload their passengers -- has become a mecca for party buses and underage drinking, according to Hill's office.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook |Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8