.
Feedback

Dog Walker Taser Incident Judgment Due Out Today

The National Park Service will release a 280-page report on the January incident where a man walking his dog off leash was hit with a taser by a park officer.

 

According to the Half Moon Bay Review, the long awaited internal review of where a National Park Service ranger used her taser on and arrested a Montara man after she stopped him for walking his dog off leash in the Rancho Corral de Tierra Golden Gate National Recreation Area is set to be released today. 

The 280-page document by the U.S. Department of the Interior will judge whether the ranger, who the National Park Service would not name prior to today's release, followed proper procedure and used appropriate force on Jan. 29, the Review reported. 

According to the ranger, she deployed her taser against Gary Hesterberg because he refused to cooperate, provided her with a false information when she asked him his name and attempted to leave the scene after she told him to stay put. 

The incident sparked a tumult of public backlash, escalating to the point where Congresswoman Jackie Speier released a statement that called into question the ranger's actions. 

"From the information I have to date, it does not appear that the use of a taser was warranted,” she said in February. 

For our back coverage of the incident, head to our topic page

Pacifica Patch reader Julianna Wahlmeier wrote a calling for the National Parks Service to name the ranger, apologize and assure local dog walkers they were safe from harm in national parks. Area dog advocates also of the incident. 

What do you think? Based on previous coverage, was the ranger in the right in using her taser on Hesterberg?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Hnin May 24, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Please help share it on your facebook as well. Anything to find our cat.Read More http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/laf/3825190526.html
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.