.
Feedback

Cuts, Layoffs Necessary To Balance City Budget

The Pacifica City Council last night approved a budget that would make cuts to every city department.

Budget shortfalls were again the primary topic of discussion in Pacifica Council chambers Monday evening. 

The proposed General Fund operating budget for fiscal year 2011-12 is $26,302,159, a decrease of $2,089,016 from the operating budget in fiscal year 2010-11. 

In order to form a balanced budget for fiscal year 2011-12, council approved the use of $547,738 in operating reserves to bridge the gap caused by ongoing structural deficit and a loss of revenue. 

Much of the revenue deficit stems from loss of the fire suppression tax that did not pass Pacifica voter approval, a tax which was expected to generate approximately $1.3 million dollars on an annual basis for the city. 

Due to the failed tax measure, city council directed staff to cut $1.5 million dollars from the fiscal year 2011-12 budget, which resulted in the current budget proposal. 

All city departments are impacted by the cuts made to reach a balanced budget.

Non-departmental expenditures were also impacted; The televising of Parks, Beaches and Recreation meetings (at a cost-savings of $5,416) was eliminated, support of the farmers' market was reduced by $2,000, and the funds for Community Clean Up operations ($3,000) were moved to the wastewater fund.   

Department restructuring resulted in the elimination of 19.7 city positions including the city attorney, both full-time to part-time positions, and eliminating vacant positions. 

The budget was approved by council in a 3 to 1 vote, with Councilmember Pete De Jarnatt dissenting.

"I will not be voting for this budget because I do not agree with many things," said De Jarnatt. "I don't think its going to save us any money" to contract city attorney services, he said. 

De Jarnatt also noted that cuts to departments are coming before cuts are made to the funding of other entities, including the public library system and . 

"The non-departmental entities aren't being cut at all. How is that fair? It's not," said De Jarnatt. 

Councilmembers called the Pacifica Resource Center a necessary "safety net that people need in these down times" and opposed funding cuts to . 

A total of 5.5 city employees are to be laid-off. A number of other layoffs will result in reassignments, demotions, or cuts from full to part-time positions.

Councilmember Digre acknowledged that the cuts to each city department does have an adverse effect on employee moral.

"I have grave concerns about the cuts we are making today," said Digre. "We have prized employees."

Mayor Mary Ann Nihart proposed that it may be necessary to take $10,ooo from a funding commitment to the Pacifica Resource Center in the future. 

"Without increased revenue, this is the first of a few hard years ahead, maybe more," said Nihart. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8