.
Feedback

Council Gets First Peek at Proposed Police Outsourcing Numbers

A consulting group commissioned to project the budgetary impact of police outsourcing is expected to bring the numbers to the Pacifica council in closed session tonight. Sources say the proposal could save the city up to $2 million annually.

Editor's note: The original version of this story inaccurately reported that a closed session city council meeting was scheduled to be held on July 9. The meeting was scheduled for July 11, and held on that day. We apologize for this reporting error.
 

 

For months, Pacifica's city councilmembers have viewed the idea of outsourcing police services in purely conceptual terms.

On Wednesday, they're expected to finally see some hard numbers.

A consulting group commissioned by the city to project the budgetary impact of outsourcing municipally controlled law enforcement services to the San Mateo County Sheriff's Department will report to the council in closed session at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall.

The meeting proceeds an open session scheduled to start at 7 p.m. 

"I expect that we'll probably see some numbers," Mayor Pete DeJarnatt told Patch.

In addition to evaluating monetary projections of police outsourcing, the consultants project the cost of transitioning to county-run policing will cost - and the cost of returning the police department if a future council is not satisfied with the sheriff department's work, DeJarnatt said.   

The council will be on its own in evaluating whether the services the sheriff's department can provide are comparable to what Pacifica already has.

"We didn't ask (the consultants) for that and I don't that's something they could effectively do," DeJarnatt said.

DeJarnatt, who's already on the record opposing police outsourcing, said tonight's closed session will mark the first time councilmembers will have a sense of whether the idea has political legs. Although the idea has come up in previous closed sessions, DeJarnatt said he hasn't yet gotten a good read on whether his colleagues support the idea.

That figures to change once the projected numbers come in.   

"I think we'll certainly have a better sense of how we feel, but I don't expect us to have a consensus," DeJarnatt said.

DeJarnatt acknowledged that temptation of outsourcing law enforcement services may be hard to resist. Pacifica, like most municipalities statewide, faces a significant structural deficit.

Patch earlier this year cited unnamed sources with knowledge of the proposal in a report projecting outsourcing could save Pacifica up to annually.

"I recognize that it would probably save us a fair amount of money but I'm wary of any plan that's supposed to save us a lot of money," DeJarnatt said.

Pacifica will get what it pays for should the city opt for critical public safety functions on the cheap, DeJarnatt said.

Although officials in San Carlos and Millbrae have reported millions in projected budgetary savings implementing similar proposals, DeJarnatt questions whether a county agency could adequately serve a city that is more geographically isolated than the more central Peninsula cities.

He said the rapport a locally controlled agency provide is essential to crime prevention.  

"That rapport and trust is part of it, and that rapport is hard to develop and it's not easily replaced," he said.

"(Pacifica police) know the area better and I think they're going to do a better job than the sheriff's department would."

DeJarnatt also questions whether projected savings would be realized. He said projected savings from a program the city implemented last decade to outsource paramedics never fully materialized.  

"I'm a little leery about proposals and how rosy the projections sometimes sound," he said. "I think sometimes when all is said and done, they don't save" as much as you'd think.

It is not clear whether DeJarnatt, who completes his last term on the council later this year, will actually have a vote on the proposal.

He said the proposal faces political resistance, noting that his constituents have indicated no appetite for outsourcing police services.

But DeJarnatt said he's committed to keeping an open mind.

"I've changed my mind before," he said. "I don't think that will happen with me because I have fairly strong convictions about this, but I think we'll have a clearer idea of what it means after this meeting."

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook |Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8