.
Feedback

City Council Upcoming Agenda Includes Coastal Erosion, Pacifica Pier, and Budget

Several infrastructural projects await city approval

Pacifica City Council’s agenda for next Monday’s meeting includes several funding requests for building and infrastructural repair projects and a 2012-2013 budget proposal of $51,532,990.

At the upcoming meeting, City Council will address repairs needed since spring of 2010 at the Pacifica Municipal Pier. The city has received a design proposal from Biggs Cardosa Associates and V&A Consulting Engineers. The Biggs Cardosa Associates proposal included a lower cost at $34,000, and city staff advises the council to approve a contract for this proposal.

California’s Wildlife Conservation Fund would reimburse this amount to make the repairs.

Also on the council’s agenda is to replace an aging sewage pipe and electrical motor at the Sharp Park Pump Station. Dahl-Beck Electric is the favored bidder for both projects, with cost proposals at $37,867 and $32,464 respectively.

San Pedro Creek Bridge, which was built 57 years ago, is also in need of attention. The council will decide whether to approve a revised plan that takes into account the California Coastal Commission’s position that widening the creek is necessary for flood control and restoration.

The bridge replacement project itself would cost approximately $9.5 million, and would be funded through federal, state, and local grants. The creek widening would cost $1.7 million. Fiscal impacts on the city would be $399,968 to be reimbursed by the San Mateo County Transportation Authority.      

The council will also be requested to confirm the continued existence of a local emergency, as declared by the Director of Emergency Services of Pacifica, at 380 and 400 Esplanade Avenue due to severe cliff erosion.

The emergency was first proclaimed in April 2010 when the revetment supporting the city storm drainage failed. Pacifica is one of several coastal towns facing erosion issues, and the Associated Press recently called the town “an early adopter of planned retreat” from the ocean.

Pacifica City Council will hold its next meeting Monday June 11 at 2212 Beach Boulevard.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | | Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Hnin May 24, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Please help share it on your facebook as well. Anything to find our cat.Read More http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/laf/3825190526.html
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.