.
Feedback

Bad Financial News Hits Pacifica

Unexpected loss of $1.4 million proves challenging for Pacifica City Council members to balance the city’s budget.

Pacifica City Council members received notification last week that the State of California is taking $1.4 million out of the city’s annual budget over the next two years due to the loss of the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF), which is commonly referred to as the property tax shift — the reallocation of taxes from counties, cities and special districts to school districts via the ERAF.

What was once a mainstay in the budget, will be no more, resulting in a shortfall of $700,000 in each of the next two years.

“The budget was balanced last year for the first time in 16 years, so this news is a blow,” said Mayor Len Stone. “It’s all hands to the pump to make some serious decisions on how we’re going to move ahead without this money. This affects everyone.”

At Thursday’s City Council study session, the Financing City Services Task Force presented options they developed to balance the city's budget, gain revenue and cut expenses in light of this bad financial news.

According to a report in the Pacifica Tribune, those revenue options include putting taxes on the ballot. Some of the options include a fire suppression assessment to gain $1 million a year, a revised utility users tax to generate $800,000 a year, a one-half cent sales tax on the Nov. 2013 ballot to collect $1 million a year, a potential $118 parcel tax to generate $1.2 million a year, or service reductions.

Expenditure options include contracting police services to save $1.7 million, after a start-up cost of about $500,000, $600,000 reductions in employee costs (subject to bargaining), police department efficiencies to be determined by the study that is underway and other reductions, which include the second half year of funding for library hours, PCT, the Resource Center and the Visitors Center.

In the Pacifica Tribune article, Ann Ritzma, Pacifica's director of administrative services, summarizes the impact to Pacifica over the loss of the ERAF funds: 

"For the City of Pacifica, the excess ERAF has annually amounted to approximately $1.4 million per year. The county's distribution of excess ERAF each year is comprised of three components -- 50 percent of the current year excess, 50 percent of the prior year excess and a 10 percent set aside from three years prior. The distribution allows for adjustments between years and per state statute a final three year 'true up' before all funds are released. The city of Pacifica has just received the 2012 distribution of $1,529,392 (50 percent of 2012, 50 percent of 2011 and 10 percent of 2009). The city expected the reduction of excess ERAF in the preparation of the fiscal year 2012/13 budget and in the draft of the five-year financial plan. At this time, the city has been advised that the county will no longer encumber any new excess ERAF (2013). The city can expect the final distribution of prior excess ERAF being held by the county. The final distributions will occur in January 2014 -- $815,000 (50 percent of 2012 and 10 percent of 2010), January 2015 -- $128,700 (10 percent of 2011) and finally January 2016 -- $152,940 (10 percent of the 2012).”

Read the full article in the Pacifica Tribune here.

Keep up with local news — follow Patch!


Sign up for Pacifica Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like” us on Facebook
"Follow” us on Twitter

 
Want to share your opinions with the Pacifica community? Start your
own blog here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8