.
Feedback

49ers Show Off New Stadium in Quest for 2016 Super Bowl

A finalist, the Bay Area continues to vie for the bid against Miami.

 

The bid to host the 2016 Super Bowl at San Francisco 49ers' new Santa Clara stadium is regional effort and would benefit the entire Bay Area, several the mayors said Wednesday.

With the unfinished $1.2 billion Santa Clara Stadium as a backdrop, San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed said the 49ers' offer to host the Super Bowl is a collaborative effort to get a huge cash infusion for area businesses.

No one gave a clear number however, as to how much revenue the region could expect though other cities may have received an amount somewhere between a quarter and half a billion, according to NBC Bay Area News.

The stadium, which is about 35 percent completed, is a finalist with the Miami Dolphins in South Florida as the site for the 50th Super Bowl in 2016, the winner to be selected on May 21 by NFL team owners.

Lee said that to win its bid with the NFL, the Bay Area needs its governments, transportation agencies, businesses and other regional organizations to show they are working together to make the Super Bowl event a success.

"I've already turned the page on the '9ers building the stadium here," said Lee, referring to the 49ers leaving Candlestick Park in San Francisco, their home since 1971, for the new Santa Clara venue in 2014. "In fact, I'm glad to actually see this is going as well as it is," Lee said.

"We made a commitment to the economy of the whole region."

But at the event besides how the stadium could impact the region economically, no other topic was addressed not even traffic or safety. A Patch reporter tried to get answer to some of these questions but was told that this media event was not about those issues. Even the San Francisco Chronicle noted that the "press event Wednesday that was all about optics and messaging but short on substance."

The Chronicle did note how home games will run off the power stored from the stadiums solar panels.

However, ABC Bay Area news reports that the bid committee will address substantive issues in their report to the NFL owners who will eventually award the bid for Super Bowl L. The report will also include all of the bells and whistles—including all of the technology—that the committee hopes will sway votes their way.

"We have one of the largest, most important economies in the world," Reed said. "Bringing the Super Bowl here will be a regional effort with regional benefits."

The 49ers, who lost the Super Bowl in a tight contest with the Baltimore Ravens last month, will play this coming football season at Candlestick and then move to the Santa Clara stadium next year.

Team officials held a news conference this morning for the media inside the stadium construction site with dignitaries such as Santa Clara Mayor Jamie Matthews, 49ers CEO Jed York and Daniel Lurie, chief of the official committee for the Super Bowl bid.

The stadium will have 68,500 seats, 1.85 million square feet of space, 21,000 parking spaces, two scoreboards covering 13,600 square feet, 30 escalators and 370 concession stands, according to the stadium's website.

Tickets will be as low at $85 for a single reserved upper deck seat to about $375 for a 50-yard-line club seat and season tickets start at $850 each plus $2,000 for a stadium builders license, or SBL, fee.

A key feature will be 165 luxury suites on sale with theater-style stadium seats, a lounge, flat screen televisions and Internet access for $250,000 to $350,000 each that can be resold like property or even willed to relatives, 49er spokesman Bob Lange said.

The suites are within a separate, windowed pavilion on the west side of the stadium and not intermingled with other seat decks, Lange said.

The winner of the bid will be announced on May 21.

Ken Guanga and Bay City News contributed to this reporting.

 

Keep up with local news — follow Patch!

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8