.
Feedback

Bellarmine? Open Division? Tigers Set for Memorable Night

Terra Nova faces enormous test in Bells when making its first appearance in CCS's elite bracket.

Would a victory over Bellarmine tonight be a greater accomplishment for the Terra Nova football program than its 2010 Central Coast Section Division III championship? Than its streak of three straight Peninsula Athletic League Bay Division titles?

The answer to both in this corner is a resounding Yes.

A few of the reasons: the level of difficulty, the size of the stage and the opportunity to improve the perception of the program.

Simply put, tonight’s Open Division quarterfinal against Bellarmine at San Jose City College may well be the highest-profile game in Terra Nova history.

Since the inception of the multi-division format of the CCS playoffs in 1980, the Tigers have never played in the designated top bracket. Until now.

Yes, the Open Division, which has been the section’s elite bracket since it was introduced in 2004, has lost a good chunk of its luster this year thanks to the exodus of several high-profile programs to the enrollment divisions. Nevertheless, when a single division boasts a California Interscholastic Federation state bowl favorite (Bellarmine) and a defending state champion (Palo Alto), you know it will still be among the toughest sectional playoff fields in Northern California.

Terra Nova couldn’t have a more difficult assignment in its maiden Open voyage. Bellarmine, which went 7-0 to claim its fourth West Catholic Athletic League title in the last five years, is widely considered the Open Division front-runner.

The Bells (9-1) narrowly missed handing De La Salle its first loss to a Northern California team since 1991 in a 26-23 overtime defeat to start the year. Ever since, they’ve been unbeatable and are now gunning for their third Open championship in four years.

Meanwhile, Terra Nova (8-2) is in uncharted waters. The Tigers haven’t faced a WCAL team in the playoffs since 2007, when they fell 44-16 to Riordan. But that was in Division III.

In 2002, a 10-0 Terra Nova team that won the PAL Bay Division met St. Francis and lost 31-19. But the Lancers, who went on to win a Division III co-championship, were just 5-5 entering the playoffs.

Perhaps the closest parallel to the challenge Bellarmine poses lies in the 2000 postseason, when the Tigers faced a 10-0 Los Gatos team led by Trent Edwards. Los Gatos won 42-14, its first step toward the Division III crown.

Whatever the case, Terra Nova will have its hands full with the Bells. Quarterback Travis McHugh and running back Tim Crawley deftly run Bellarmine’s version of the scrum offense, helping their team average 37.6 points while playing a formidable schedule. Terra Nova figures to benefit some from having faced a similar style of offense in two of its last three games – The King’s Academy and Half Moon Bay – but those teams don’t have comparable athletes.

The Tigers’ offense also will get its toughest test in years. Bellarmine has allowed just 12.4 points per game, and has yet to give up more than 26 points. Terra Nova averages 38.1 points, with a season low of 27 points. Something has to give.

Bellarmine has the experience and the pedigree. The Bells are in the Open field for the seventh straight year and have advanced to at least the semifinals the last four years. Moreover, an outright WCAL champion has never lost an Open quarterfinal.

Meanwhile, Terra Nova is the third smallest public school to qualify in the Open Division’s nine years. Scotts Valley (2006) and San Lorenzo Valley (2005) suffered quick exits.

And Terra Nova is just the second Peninsula Athletic League program to make the Open field. Aragon earned a bid in the Open’s first three years, compiling a record of 1-3.

So, tonight’s game represents a historic opportunity for the Tigers. And a spectacular challenge.

No matter the outcome, it’s bound to be memorable.

For more news about Pacifica and surrounding areas, including the San Mateo County Coastside, follow us on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8