.
Feedback

Sharks On Verge of Endangered Status

Protecting great white sharks is long overdue, one Northern California researcher says.

One of the ocean's most-feared predators may need some protection of its own.

Great white sharks could be added the California Endangered Species Act following a year-long review to make sure the carnivorous creature is at-risk, according to a report in the San Francisco Chronicle earlier this month.

Sean Van Sommeran, executive director of the conservation and research group Pelagic Shark Research Foundation in Santa Cruz, says protecting great white sharks is something he's been fighting for since the early 1990s. 

"I think they could have clearly been declared a no-take species worldwide much earlier," Van Sommeran said. "The data's been there for years."

California's Fish and Game Commission voted 4-0 in early February to bestow "endangered" status to white sharks in 2014. In the interim, the state Department of Fish and Wildlife will collect data on white shark populations, according to the Mercury News.

Studies show there are only a few hundred adult Northeastern Pacific white sharks in the region, which ranges from Mexico to the Bering Sea, and offshore to Hawaii.

Great white sharks most often make headlines for occasional sightings near the beach and rare attacks on surfers. Adults average 13 to 17 feet long and weigh 1,500 to 2,000 pounds. The largest of the sharks are upwards of 18 feet long and weigh nearly 5,000 pounds.

"I’ve been out in the water and I feel fairly safe in here, but they do cruise around here," Ed Burrell, the owner of the Capitola Boat & Bait, told Patch last summer following a spate of shark sightings in the Monterey Bay and one attack on a kayak.

The Pelagic Shark Research Foundation operates a white shark monitoring program on Año Nuevo Island in San Mateo County. There, researchers have tracked sharks as far as Hawaii and Baja, Mexico.

Van Sommeran, who grew up in Santa Cruz and saw his first shark in the wild at age 12, explained the complicated journey white sharks have made to the state's Endangered Species List.

"The effort to get white sharks and basking sharks [protected] actually began in 1990 and '91," Van Sommeran said.

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill banning the hunting of sharks up to three miles off the California coast in 1994. Further protections were added in the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary in 1997, according to Van Sommeran.

He told Patch the Endangered Species Act development is "good news that white sharks will be further protected."

But there has been no wider protection, which Van Sommeran said is integral to helping the species flourish. How those safeguards are implemented will be critical to the success of the effort, he said.  

Targeting directed poaching, such as fishermen who net or harpoon sharks but plead that they killed the finned fish accidentally, is a good first step, according to Van Sommeran. Similarly, reducing sport poaching—glamorized by TV shows where sharks pursued, captured and tagged—off the Mexican coast needs to be a focus.

Outside of poaching, preserving great white sharks' habitat is the other crucial piece to protecting the species, Van Sommeran said. While steps have been taken to do that in Northern California, the sharks migrate through a larges swath of the Pacific Ocean. Keeping tourists boats, which may feed marine life or desensitize sharks to human contact, out of some of those areas could benefit shark populations.

Van Sommeran acknowledged that these protections, to be effective, need to stretch beyond the California coast.

Three environmental groups have also petitioned the National Marine Fisheries Service to include great whites on the federal endangered species list, according to the Mercury News. That will be decided next summer.

Do you think great white sharks need more protections? Why or Why not? Tell us in the comment section below.

Read more on Patch:

  • Pacifica Pedestrian Hit by Alleged DUI Driver
  • Devil's Slide Tunnels — a Massive Art Installation
  • Pacifica Makes List of 100 Safest Cities in America
  • Peninsula Humane Society Responds to Horrifying Dog Attack Case

Keep up with local news — follow Patch!

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8