.
Feedback

National Parks Pump Big Bucks Into Peninsula Economy

Golden Gate National Recreation Area visitors spent an estimated $290 million in 2011, a new study shows.

They might contribute to weekend traffic gridlock, but National Park tourists on the Peninsula and elsewhere in the San Francisco Bay Area spend millions of dollars annually and their visits create thousands of jobs, according to a report released last week by the National Park Service.

Non-local National Park visitors in California spent nearly $1.2 billion in 2011, more than any other state or the District of Columbia. National Parks tourism was credited with creating almost 18,000 jobs statewide and $690 million in labor income, according to the report.

More than 17 million people visited the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Point Reyes National Seashore and Muir Woods National Monument in 2011, the most recent year data is available.

GGNRA, which spans 59 miles of bay and ocean shoreline in San Mateo, Marin, San Francisco and Marin counties, includes Rancho Corral de Tierra, Milagra Ridge, Sweeney Ridge and Mori Point in Pacifica.

Fort Baker, the Marin HeadlandsOakwood ValleyOlema Valley, Point Bonita Lighthouse, Stinson Beach, Tennessee Valley and Muir Beach Overlook in Marin accounted for nearly 14.6 million of those 17 million visitors. It generated an estimated $290 million in spending in 2011, while Point Reyes generated an estimated $93.3 million and Muir Woods accounted for $61.7 million, according to the report.

There were more than 3,400 jobs created around providing services to GGNRA, Muir Woods and Point Reyes visitors, the report stated.

"The National Park Service is proud to have been entrusted with the care of America’s most treasured places and delighted that the visitors we welcome generate significant contributions to the local, state, and national economy," NPS Regional Director Chris Lehnertz said in a statement.

National Park Economic Impact, 2011 Park Annual Visits Spending: All Visitors Spending: Non-Local Visitors Jobs Labor Income Fort Point National Historical Site 1,338,508 $92.1 million $85.6 million 1,145 $45 million Golden Gate National Recreation Area 14,567,487 $290 million $120 million 1,566 $62 million Muir Woods National Monument 897,131 $61.7 million $57.4 million 767 $52.4 million Pinnacles National Monument 393,219 $8.4 million $6.9 million 357 $5.7 million Point Reyes National Seashore 2,129,116 $93.3 million $84.9 million 1,105 $43.5 million San Fransisco Maritime Historical Park 4,224,897 $95.5 million $70.7 million 855 $33.8 million

Spending directly associated with National Parks happens within a 60-mile radius around each park, known as the local region.

Visitor spending figures were calculated using the Money Generation Model version 2, which uses number of park visits and spending averages from park visitor surveys, as well as local and national economic multipliers. Dollars spent, however, does not include the cost of park fees.

Surrounding GGNRA, locals bucked the regional trend and actually out-spent visitors. Tourists shelled out $120 million but  those who lived within 60 miles of the recreation area still accounted for 59 percent of visitor spending.

Here's how much visitors pay, on average, for various types of National Park visits. The figures are system-wide (national).

  • A party of local residents on a day trip to a park: $49.86.
  • Non-locals on a day trip:t $75.02.
  • A group of back-country campers: $59.91 per night.
  • A party of visitors staying in a park lodge: $330.70 per night.
  • Campers staying inside the park: $86.72 per night.
  • Campers staying outside the park: $119.86 per night.

National Park visitors' two biggest costs are food and lodging, accounting for nearly half of what they spend during the trip. Muir Woods doesn't have overnight options, but Point Reyes and GGNRA do. In 2011, there were 40,811 overnight stays in the national seashore and 60,927 in GGNRA, according to the study.

"We attract visitors from all across the U.S. and around the world who come here to experience these parks and then spend time and money enjoying the services provided by our neighboring communities," Lehnertz said.

Keep up with local news — follow Patch!


Sign up for Pacifica Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like” us on Facebook
"Follow” us on Twitter

 
Want to share your opinions with the Pacifica community? Start your
own blog here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Hnin May 24, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Please help share it on your facebook as well. Anything to find our cat.Read More http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/laf/3825190526.html
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.