.
Feedback

Countywide Tax Measures in Upcoming Election

June 5 election includes three tax initiatives to help balance the budget, but critics say the hikes would hurt the local community


On Tuesday Pacificans will have the opportunity to vote on three countywide ballot measures that would involve tax increases. Supporters of each initiative point to the county’s $28 million budget deficit as evidence of their necessity.

According to proponents, Measure T would raise $8 million annually by levying a 2.5% tax on car rental businesses in unincorporated areas: “San Mateo County residents must content with all of the traffic and pollution caused by vehicles transiting through our county....This measure simply allows local residents to derive a modest benefit in return.” Yet critics say that a tax on rental cars would threaten the security of the county’s 10,000 jobs at San Francisco Airport.

Measure U would raise the current tax on transient occupancy from 10% to 12%, and it would apply to any individual occupying a hotel room or other temporary lodging for 30 consecutive days. Proponents say that revenue from this increase will come from visitors to the area but will remain in San Mateo County, benefiting local communities. Yet opponents argue that Measure U would hurt tourism and decrease job security for workers in the hospitality industry.

Lastly, Measure X would levy a tax on operators of commercial parking facility businesses in unincorporated areas of the county. The tax would be 8% of gross receipts, and supporters say it would raise $5 million countywide.

Critics of all three measures question whether county officials would be held accountable for how the extra funds would be appropriated. “The County claims this will benefit police, fire, schools, but there’s nothing to hold them to it,” the rebuttal of Measure U states. “If we have to raise taxes, we should insist on controls to ensure the money is spent on what matters most.”

Each of these measures needs a majority vote to pass. For more information about the upcoming election, see the county's Voter Toolkit here. Check back next week for continued coverage of the election.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | | Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8