.
Feedback

Number of Homeless People in Pacifica Up From 2011

Pacifica Resource Center volunteers found nearly 30 percent more homeless people living in Pacifica than they did in 2011, many of them living in vehicles.

The 2013 Homeless One-Day Count took place on Jan. 24 between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m., according to the San Mateo County Human Services Agency, where hundreds of volunteers fanned out across the county and drove or walked through every census tract, taking note of the number of homeless individuals, families and encampments that were seen.

In Pacifica, the Pacifica Resource Center sent out 16 volunteer street enumerators, including three homeless guides, two former homeless people who were guides, Pacifica City Councilmember Karen Ervin, and the Director of Child Services for San Mateo County Human Services Agency, who lives in Pacifica.

These volunteers came back with some very preliminary information from their morning’s One-Day Count. They tallied:

• 8 homeless men, women and youth

• 27 cars with sleeping occupants

• 30 vans or RVS with sleeping occupants

• 11 encampments with sleeping occupants

According to the Pacifica Resource Center, this up nearly 30 percent from their 2011 count.

“In 2011, our preliminary numbers were 59 — 13 homeless men, women and youth outside and 17 cars, 12 vans or RVs, and 17 encampments with sleeping occupants – which translated to 95 when the county did its calculations for the cars, vans, RVs, and encampments,” said Anita Rees, executive director for the Pacifica Resource Center. “As you can see, we saw more folks in cars, vans, or RVs this year.”

The results of the count provide valuable data for policymakers and organizations that provide services and develop programs for homeless residents of San Mateo County, according to the Human Services Agency. Final data for the County will be released in May 2013.

As a result of the numbers and with shelter options so limited on the Coast, the Pacifica Resource Center is considering plans for a warming shelter in Pacifica.

“It would be a warming shelter of sorts, modeled loosely on Home & Hope, which would be hosted at local churches for the nights that temperatures are low or the weather is bad,” said Rees.

San Mateo County has an inclement weather program that funds extra shelter beds and in some cases motel stays when overnight temperatures of 38 degrees or lower with a probability of rain less than 50 percent or a forecast overnight low of 42 degrees or lower and a probability of rain of 50 percent or greater, explains Rees.

“The warming shelter would be activated locally based on more flexible guidelines and only when the County’s program is not activated,” she said.

The goal is to test the warming shelter idea this winter and have it up and running for the next inclement weather season, which runs Nov. 15 through April 15.

“Ultimately, we’d want the shelter program in San Mateo County to take over the warming shelter or work on other options for shelter on the Coast, since the only option now is to get into one of the shelters in South San Francisco or Redwood City,” said Rees.

The waiting list for the South San Francisco shelter is over 100 people long and the Redwood City shelter only takes folks on a first-come, first-served basis “so we have to check daily if someone wants to relocate to Redwood City,” said Rees.

Another option the Pacifica Resource Center is considering is “buying” a bed at the shelters so that when they have someone who needs to get in, they can refer them immediately.

Rees is currently searching for funding and community support now “so we can move on both of these solutions,” she said.

With shelter options limited, what do you think about a warming shelter on the Coast? Would you support a homeless shelter hosted at a local church?

 

Keep up with local news — follow Patch!

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Pacifica Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet Arline Barker May 17, 2013 at 11:18 am
Awesome! Next Tuesday, Thursday or Friday are open. Name a time and place. I used to write 3Read More different columns for San Bruno, Millbrae, and Burlingame Patch. I am ready to write for Pacifica Patch & blog too. Here's my personal blog...I do sporadically. Www.art-Janet.blogspot.com My art studio is at Sanchez Art Center #11
Christa Bigue (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 11:05 am
When can we meet for coffee Janet? Since you're the first one to post in our biz update section youRead More get to have coffee and chat with your local Patch editor! Email me at christa.bigue@patch.com and we'll find a date and place.
Anon. April 14, 2013 at 01:43 am
I can start with the comments on the Theravance drug, fluticasone fluroate - the active moiety inRead More this compound is the same, fluticasone (proprionate) that has been marketed by GSK for the same indication for approximately 25 years. Indeed, that patent is so old, and the drug has such a proven track record for safety and efficacy, that the patent has expired and there are generic versions available. There is also in implicit assumption by the author that the only reason that the FDA will approve medications in a short time span is because they are for 'life-or-limb' or unmet serious medical need. This is just not the case - regulators in many countries, including the FDA in the USA, may give accelerated approval to a product, where the safety and tolerability of a product is equivalent to a similar active agent which has already been approved. I suspect this is the case for fluticasone fluroate - but I am not privy to the details of the regulatory filing. I note that none of the companies mentioned here, nor the FDA, has provided input to this article. The journalism in this article smacks of someone trying to make a name for themselves quickly by scaring uneducated and/or anxious people. The science is just plain flawed.
Pacificat April 12, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Please tell us in what ways it is ill-informed
Anon. April 11, 2013 at 08:22 pm
Ill-informed, sensationalist rubbish.
Deb Wong March 26, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Thanks, Stacie!
Stacie Chan (Editor) March 26, 2013 at 02:51 pm
Absolutely stunning photos, Deb! Thanks for sharing. I really feel like I was there by just perusingRead More your photo gallery.
Donna Fentanes March 26, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks, Deb, for the videos. Now we all can take one last ride. :)
Jim Clifford March 25, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Each column gets better. I look for "The Shoe."
Deb Wong March 25, 2013 at 11:19 am
I think many of us can relate! 10 kids, huh? I was the oldest of 9, so sort of understand. MyRead More family grew up in Pacifica, & we rode over the slide every weekend when we went to the HMB airport to tend to my father's airplanes. I drove on it once, during driver's ed in high school, scary! I have an old home movie clip from 1966, going over the slide. Very overexposed, but you can still see parts of the slide in it. More recently, took 2 videos of our drive over the slide, North & south views. Going North: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8NKnu9Gvw Going South: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rlN_g2LeE8